Category Politics & Parliaments

Who is Vladimir Putin?

Here’s the man who made the world shudder, with his attack on Ukraine. Russia’s current president, Vladimir Putin is one of the strongest leaders in the world.

He was born in Leningrad, the city now named as St. Petersburg. After graduating in law in 1975, he joined the KGB, the dreaded secret service of the Soviet Union. He was further trained at the Yuri Andropov Red Banner Institute in Moscow, and then worked in East Germany under the pretence of being a translator. He left the KGB following the coup against Mikhail Gorbachev, which he did not agree with.

Putin then sought a career in politics and was quite successful in it. He reached the highest position in Russia in 2000. Among all the current presidents in Europe, Putin is the second longest serving – behind only Alexander Lukashenko of Belarus. In fact, the Russian constitution allowed a person to serve as president only for two terms. To get around this problem, a shrewd Putin chose to be the prime minister in 2008, swapping places with the then prime minister Dimitri Medvedev. Putin was re-elected as president in 2018, for the fourth time. In April 2021, he changed the constitution so as to allow him to be elected as president for two more terms. This would enable him to remain as president until 2036.

Putin’s rule of Russia is characterized by a shift to authoritarianism. His government is also accused of gross human rights abuses. Most recently, the attack on Ukraine has added to his image as a ruthless ruler.

Picture Credit : Google

What is a coup?

On February 1, 2021, people of Myanmar woke up to the news that the country’s military has seized power from the elected government in a coup. The country’s President Win Myint, State Counsellor and de facto leader Aung San Suu Kyi, and numerous members of her party National League for Democracy (NLD) were detained. In a television address, the army announced that power had been handed over to the commander-in-chief of the armed forces, Min Aung Hlaing, and that it was declaring a national state of emergency for one year. People also fear that there could be wider clampdown under the military rule. Let’s take a look at what led to a coup Myanmar in this Five Ws and One H..

A coup (pronounced koo) is when power is illegally and unconstitutionally seized from the government of country, by a political faction or the military. Violence is part of many coups. In other words, a coup is the forcible overthrow of ruler or government. The word coup is short for the French term “coup detat,” which translates as “stroke of state.”

Coup is often the result of displeasure with how the country is run by the elected government or ruler. A military coup, as in the case of Myanmar, is when the military takes control of governance by staging a coup.

What are the different types of coup?

The world has witnessed different kinds of coup and political scientists categorise them into various types. Some of them are military coup, civil society coup, parliamentary coup, presidential coup, breakthrough coup, silent coup, democratic coup and the guardian coup.

Why did the military stage a coup in Myanmar?

A crisis has been brewing in Myanmar since the November 2020 parliamentary election, in which Suu Kyi’s NLD party won in a landslide against the military-backed Union Solidarity and Development party. The latter won just 33 out of 476 seat. But the military refused to accept the results, claiming widespread irregularities in the election and demanded a new military-supervised election. However, the election commission refused, saying there was no evidence to support its claims of fraudulence.

Citing a provision in the Constitution it had drafted (in 2008), the military warned that it could launch a coup if it felt a threat to the nation’s sovereignty.

And on February 1, which was supposed to be the first day of a new session of parliament since the November election, the military staged a coup.

What is the background?

Myanmar gained independence from Britain in 1948 and Sao Shwe Thaik became its first president and U Nu became its first prime minister. In 1962, the Tatmadaw, as the country’s military is formally known, staged a coup and took over power. Since then, Myanmar has switched between military rule and civilian leadership.

Myanmar was ruled by the armed forces from 1962 to 2011, when pressure from the international community forced the military to cede power and a new government ushered in a return to civilian rule. But the Constitution the military had drafted ahead of this cessation gave it at least 25% of the seats in the Legislature. According to the Constitution, any amendment is possible only if over 75% of lawmakers vote for it. So, in effect, the military holds the power to veto any attempt by the government that could be seen as a threat to its authority.

In 2015, Suu Kyi’s NLD won a sweeping victory in the general elections. However, the military retained significant power under the Constitution that also barred her from the presidency, as her two sons are citizens and ran the government as a de facto leader (a leader in fact, whether or not constitutionally binding).

The election in November 2020 was only Myanmar’s second-ever election since the end of the military rule in 2011. Post election, Suu Kyi proposed to make amendments to Myanmar’s Constitution and Strip the military of many of its authorities. This move received major support from people, but ruffled the feathers of the military.

How has the international community reacted?

World leaders condemn the coup and detainment of Suu Kyi. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said it was a “serious blow to democratic reforms”, while the U.S. President Joe Biden has threatened to reinstate sanctions. Meanwhile, people of Myanmar resorted to non-violent means to register their protest against the coup.

What are some of the coups in the recent times?

Many coups (pronounced kooz) have been staged in the past. Here, we are listing some of the recent ones.

1999 Pakistan coup: The the military leader Parvez Musharraf overthrew the Pakistani government under Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on October 12, 1999. It was a bloodless coup as Musharraf declared an emergency and took control of the entire country.

2013 Egyptian Coup: On July 3, 2013, Egyptian army chief General Abdel Fattah al-Sisi led a coalition to remove the President of Egypt, Mohamed Morsi, from power and suspended the Egyptian constitution.

2016 Turkish failed coup attempt: On July 15, 2016, the Turkish military attempted a coup against President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, but could not succeed in overthrowing the government. Hundreds were killed in the violence that ensued and thousands were detained subsequently.

2019 Sudanese coup: On April 11, 2019, Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir, after nearly 30 years in office, was overthrown by the Sudanese army after popular protest demanded his departure.

 

Picture Credit : Google

What is impeachment?

Recently, thousands of Donald Trump’s supporters stormed the US. Capitol, and interrupted the Congress where lawmakers were about to certify President-elect Joe Biden’s win in the November 3 election. Subsequently, Trump was charged with inciting violence against the government of the United States”. There were calls from Democrats to impeach President Trump, a Republican, in his final week in power. What is impeachment? Who can be impeached from office? How is it done? Here’s a primer.

What it means

Impeachment is a proceeding that is initiated by a legislative body against a top government official for serious misconduct. The charges are put forth, and the official is tried, while still in office. Different countries have their own impeachment processes.

Origin

The first recognised case of impeachment was in 1376 during the reign of Edward III in England. The process was sparingly used till the 17th Century, when it was revived to eliminate unpopular subjects of the Crown. However, after the unsuccessful impeachment trials of Warren Hastings (1788-95) and Lord Melville (1806), it fell out of use in Britain.

The U.S. process

In the U.S., the power to impeach a President rests with Congress (that includes the House of Representatives and the Senate). According to the US, Constitution, a President shall be removed from office impeachment for, and conviction of treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanours”. This also applies to the Vice President and all civil officers of the US.

The Indian president

In India, impeachment is raised in either House of Parliament. A President can face Impeachment for ‘violation of the Constitution’. There has to be a majority of no less than two-thirds of the total membership of both houses of Parliament.

Article 61 lays down that when a President is to be either impeached the charge shall be preferred by House of Parliament The other House will investigate or cause the charge to be investigated. The President has the right to appear or to be represented at such investigations

Similarly, Parliament can introduce a motion seeking the removal of judges, including the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and High Courts. However, though the process that ensures checks against misconduct is quite similar the word impeachment does not figure in the Constitution in the context of judges (Article 124-4).

Why is impeachment necessary?

Without impeachment there will be no system of checks and balances to ensure that the person who is legally considered to be the most important functionary in the political system does not abuse his office.

Past notable impeachments

The first U. S. President to face impeachment was Andrew Johnson (1868). Other notable impeachments include those against Presidents Richard Nixon (1973), Bill Clinton (1998) and Donald Trump (2019). If the process is taken up, Trump with be the first president to face impeachment twice.

In India, no President has faced impeachment so far.

 

Picture Credit : Google

What is the Central Vista Project?

Prime Minister Narendra Modi last month laid the foundation stone for the new Parliament building in New Delhi. Do you know where it’s going to come up, when it will be completed and what its proposed features are?

The new building will be constructed close to the existing Parliament building in the Parliament House Estate, under the Central Vista Redevelopment Project. It is expected to be completed by 2022 in time for the commemoration of the 75th year of India’s Independence. The landmark project, which was announced in 2019, involves constructing a Parliament building, a common central secretariat and revamping of the three-km long stretch from the Rashtrapati Bhavan to India Gate known as the Central Vista. According to PM Modi, the Central Vista Project will be “a symbol of a new, self reliant India”.

The triangular-shaped Parliament building is designed by architect Bimal Patel of Ahmedabad-based HCP Design, Planning and Management. Tata Projects Limited won the bid to construct the new Parliament building with an area of 64,500 square metres at an estimated cost of 3971 crore.

Highlights

The new triangular building will have four storeys, and the national emblem will crown the edifice. Its interiors will be inspired by the national flower lotus and the national bird peacock. In the new building, the Lok Sabha chamber will have a seating capacity for 1,224 members, while the Rajya Sabha will have 384 seats. At present, the Lok Sabha has strength of 543 members and Rajya Sabha 245. The new building will also have a Central Constitution Hall to showcase the country’s democratic heritage, a library, committee rooms and dining areas.

The existing circular Parliament House building will be refurbished for use along with the new one. The North and South blocks will be converted into museums.

Why is the revamp needed?

According to the Government, the existing Parliament building built by the British in the 1920s is structurally unsafe. Most of the buildings along the Central Vista have outlived their structural lives. Inadequate infrastructure, lack of safety features and offices spread over different locations are also cited as the reasons for the revamp. It is said that the proposed Secretariat buildings, which will bring all offices in one place, will help improve the functioning of the government.

Criticism against the project

The Central Vista redevelopment project is criticised for having been initiated when the country is reeling under the coronavirus pandemic. Some experts have raised concerns about the project’s environmental impact. Several petitions challenging the project were filed before the Supreme Court. However, the apex court has given the green signal to the project, upholding the environment clearance and permission for change in land use for the project. The government has clarified that it will be sensitive to environmental concerns during construction.

 

Picture Credit : Google

Where do leaders work?

Many people work in tall skyscrapers, small office buildings, or tiny shops. And people who run governments often work in places that are works of art that look powerful or grand. The buildings in which they work might be gleaming while mansions, majestic palaces, or buildings tucked behind the walls of a fortress. Here are some famous government buildings around the world.

The government of Andorra, one of the world’s smallest countries, meets in the House of Valleys.

The White House, in Washington, D.C., is the home and the office of the president of the U.S.A.

Both houses of the Indian parliament meet in the Parliament House in New Delhi.

The Kremlin, in Moscow, is an old fort. It contains many of Russia’s government buildings.

The British government meets in the Houses of Parliament in London, England.

 

Picture Credit : Google

What should be decided during transition period?

The U.K. has to negotiate its future relationship with Europe. Formal negotiations for this will begin on March 3, 2020.

The bulk of these negotiations will focus on the U.K. – EU’s future trading relationship. The U.K. is leaving the EU customs union an common market, so the two sides have two work out a trade agreement, ideally with no tariffs and with minimal barriers.

The two sides also have to discuss

  • Security and law enforcement cooperation
  • Access to fishing waters
  • Banking
  • Aviation standards and safety
  • Supplies of electricity and gas
  • Licensing and regulation of medicines
  • Data and intelligence sharing
  • Manufacturing and a whole lot more.
  • The border between Ireland (which is part of the EU) and Northern Ireland (which is a part of UK and leaving the EU) will remain open. But how to implement customs checks on this border will need to be worked out. 

 

Picture Credit : Google

What has changed after Brexit day?

A transition period has begun immediately after Brexit day and is due to end on December 31, 2020. During this 11-month period, the U.K. will continue to follow EU rules. Britain’s trading relationship will remain the same and it will continue to pay into the EU budget. People travelling to EU member states will not be affected during the transition period. But the UK will no longer have any say in EU policies nor will it be able to attend any meeting of EU leaders.

The transition period is meant to give both sides some breathing space while a new free trade agreement is negotiated.

This is needed because the UK will leave the single market and customs union at the end of the transition. A free trade agreement will allow goods to move around the EU without checks or extra charges.

If a new one cannot be agreed in time, then the UK faces the prospect of having to trade with no deal in place. That would mean tariffs (taxes) on UK goods travelling to the EU and other trade barriers.

 

Picture Credit : Google

How did Britain join European Union?

David Cameron was the Prime Minister of the U.K. when the referendum took place. Personally, he supported staying within the EU. As the votes turned against his campaign, he stepped down as PM.

As leader of the Conservative Party, Theresa May took over from David Cameron in 2016. May promised to put Brexit into action. However, Brexit hit a roadblock for various reasons. Unable to get a Brexit divorce deal passed on Parliament, May stepped down on June 7, 2019, after a turbulent 3-year period as prime minister.

On July 23, 2019, Brexit hardliner Boris Johnson, former Mayor of London and British Foreign Minister, was elected Prime Minister. Johnson was keen on delivering Brexit by the October 31, 2019 deadline. However, Johnson needed a Brexit extension of his own after MPs failed to get the revised deal passed into law. This led to the new deadline of January 31, 2020.

 

Picture Credit : Google

Why did the UK vote to leave the EU?

People in support of Brexit view the EU as exercising too much control over Britain, thereby halting its growth. One of the main areas of contention is immigration. They are against the EU’s main principle of ‘Free Movement’ within member states. ‘Leave’ supporters want more autonomy from the EU to control Britain’s border and to sign trade deals with any country without the interference of the EU. They also don’t want to come under the ambit of the EU court of justice.

Those who campaigned for Britain to stay in the EU argued that the immigrants would only boost economic growth. They were of the view that the EU membership would ensure security for the nation in times of crisis. Exports feel that remaining in the EU would have conferred several advantages on Britain such as free trade opportunities and easy mobility of goods and services among the EU member countries.

 

Picture Credit : Google

What is the European Union?

The European Union (EU) is a group of 28 countries in the continent of Europe. (After Brexit, the membership now stands at 27). After World War II, some European countries came together to form a group to foster economic, social and political cooperation. They saw this as a means to stay united and not go to war with each other.

With France and Germany taking the initiative, four other nations namely Belgium, Italy, Luxembourg and the Netherlands, signed up to form the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1957. It was also called the common market.

The EU has its own currency (euro), own parliament, council and court of justice. It became a single market, allowing goods and people to move around as if they are one nation. The currency euro is being used by 19 member states.

 

Picture Credit : Google

What is Brexit?

Brexit is now official: On January 31, 2020, the United Kingdom left the European Union. But not completely yet. The U.K. has entered into an 11-month transition period which will last till at least December 31, 2020. During this time, the U.K. and the EU will hold discussions and decide what their future relationship will be like.

The term is an portmanteau of the words ‘Britain’ and ‘exit.’ Britain had been a member of the EU since 1973 (The Union was then called the European Economic Community). But on June 23, 2016, the U.K. made a historic decision to withdraw its membership following a referendum. Of the total 33 million votes, 52% chose to leave the EU, while 48% wanted to stay on. (The U.K. Scotland and Northern Ireland. It is to be noted that the majority of the voters in Scotland and Northern Ireland chose to remain. However the whole of U.K. has left the EU.)

The exit did not happen immediately after the voting. It was a long journey from there – it took three-and-a-half years, three prime ministers and endless votes in Parliament before Britain finally became the first-ever country to leave the EU last month.

 

Picture Credit : Google 

What are chads?

In the U.S. presidential election of 2000, there was chaos in the state of Florida where votes had to be recounted by hand due to a glitch in the voting machines. The voting machines used cards which had to be punched through for a vote to be registered. A mechanical problem meant that a huge number of cards were incompletely punched out, leaving the bits of paper called chads, ‘hanging’. Some cards had ‘dimpled’ or ‘pregnant’ chads meaning there was only a barely visible indentation!

Chads are the small pieces of paper produced when holes are punched out in a sheet. The bits punched out of tape, plastic, textile or thin metal are also called chads. Punch cards were once widely used in computer programming and the word ‘chad’ probably originated during that time. However, the earliest use of a punch card was in a fully automated weaving loom invented by Joseph Jacquard in 1801.

A number of manufacturing industries generate chads as waste. Since they are small and weigh almost nothing, managing chads is quite bothersome. Paper manufacturers have chad collectors under the punching table to collect the chads which are later recycled and made into new paper.

There are also ‘chad-less’ punching systems available which make slits in the paper instead of holes.

 

Picture Credit : Google

Which missiles were test fired in successfully by India recently?

Agni-V

On April 19, 2012, India successfully test-fired 5000 km range Agni-V Intercontinental Ballistic Missile, developed by DRDO. Part of the Agni series of missiles, Agni V has been developed as a nuclear deterrent against China. The missile is expected to be inducted into service soon.

Dhanush

On Feb. 23, 2018, the nuclear-capable ‘Dhanush’ ballistic missile with a strike range of 350 km was successfully test-fired from a naval ship off Odisha coast. The surface-to-surface missile is a naval variant of the indigenously-developed ‘Prithvi 3’ missile.

Mission Shakti

On March 27, 2019, India conducted Mission Shakti, a high precision anti-satellite missile test, from the Dr. APJ Abdul Kalam Island launch complex. The significance of the test carried out by the DRDO is that India has successfully demonstrated its capability to intercept a satellite in outer space. With this test, the country joins an exclusive group of space-faring nations comprising the U.S., Russia and China.

 

Picture Credit : Google

Which are the SC’s landmark judgments?

Triple Talaq: 2017

On Aug.22, 2017, the SC ruled that the traditional method of Muslim men instantly divorcing their wives by uttering “talaq” thrice was “unconstitutional” and “arbitrary”. Under the court’s instruction, the Lok Sabha on Dec. 27, 2018, passed the Muslim Women Bill (Triple Talaq) 2018, criminalizing the practice. The offence now attracts a fine and a jail term up to three years for the husband.

Section 377: 2018

In a historic judgment, the Supreme Court on September 6 decriminalized homosexuality with a prayer to the LGBTQ (Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer) community to forgive history for their “brutal” suppression. A five-judge Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra, further stated that sexual orientation is natural and choice of partner is part of the fundamental right to privacy.

Sabarimala: 2018

On September 28, 2018, the SC lifted the ban that prevented women and girls in the 10-50 age group from entering the famous Sabarimala Ayyappa temple in Kerala. It held that this centuries-old Hindu religious practice was illegal and unconstitutional. Subsequently on Nov 14, 2019, the SC referred the Sabarimala issues to a larger, seven-member bench after hearing pleas seeking a review of its decision to allow women of all ages into the temple.

Ayodhya: 2019

On Nov. 9, 2019, the decades-old sensitive Ayodhya land title case came to an end with the SC handling over possession of the disputed 2.77 acre site to the deity Ram Lalla, one of the three litigants in the case, and directed that a Ram temple be built on the site which many Hindus believe was the birth place of Ram. It directed that a trust be formed by the Central government within three months to manage the property and oversee the temple construction. The apex court also directed that 5 acres of land on an alternative site in Ayodhya be provided to the Sunni Waqf Board for building a mosque. It dismissed the plea of Nirmohi Akara seeking control of the entire disputed land. The court also ruled that the demolition of the Babri Masjid which stood at the disputed site in 1992 by kar sevaks was in violation of law.

 

Picture Credit : Google

When Abhijit Banerjee wins Nobel prize in economics?

Indian-American economist Abhijit Banerjee won the 2019 Nobel Prize in Economics, along with his French-American wife Esther Duflo of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Michael Kremer of Harvard University “for their experimental approach to alleviating global poverty.” The three were recognized for their ability to divide the issue of tackling global poverty into smaller subjects. They were awarded medals and the prize money of nine million Swedish krona (approximately Rs 6.7 crore) in Sweden on Dec. 11, 2019. According to the Nobel citation, their extensive research will help in improving the ability to combat global poverty.

Banerjee and his co-workers try to measure the effectiveness of actions (such as government programmes) in improving people’s lives. For this, they use randomized controlled trials, similar to clinical trials in medical research. For example, although polio vaccination is freely available in India, many mothers were not bringing their children for the vaccination drives. Banerjee and Prof. Esther Duflo, also from MIT, tried an experiment in Rajasthan, where they gifted a bag of pulses to mothers who vaccinated their children. Soon, the immunization rate went up in the region. In another experiment, they found that learning outcomes improved in schools that were provided with teaching assistants to help students with special needs.

 

Picture Credit : Google

How is 370 abrogated?

The Government of India on August5, 2019, revoked Article 370 which accorded special status to then state of Jammu and Kashmir. Included in the Indian Constitution on October 17, 1949, Article 370 permitted the state to draft its own Constitution and enjoy special rights. J&K citizens lived under a separate set of laws, including those related to citizenship, ownership of property and fundamental rights. The Central government further bifurcated the state into two Union Territories of J&K and Ladakh. The Union territory of J&K has a legislature where key subjects such as law and order are with the Centre, while that of Ladakh has no legislature. Following the scrapping of Article 370, an uneasy calm prevailed in the Valley with restrictions on public movement and communication network.

In the case of Jammu and Kashmir, the representatives to the Constituent Assembly requested that only those provisions of the Indian Constitution that corresponded to the original Instrument of Accession should be applied to the State and that the state’s constituent assembly, when formed, would decide on the other matters. Government of India agreed to the demands shortly before the above meeting with the other states. Accordingly, the Article 370 was incorporated into the Indian Constitution, which stipulated that the other articles of the Constitution that gave powers to the Central Government would be applied to Jammu and Kashmir only with the concurrence of the State’s constituent assembly. This was a “temporary provision” in that its applicability was intended to last till the formulation and adoption of the State’s constitution. However, the State’s constituent assembly dissolved itself on 25 January 1957 without recommending either abrogation or amendment of the Article 370. Thus, the Article was considered to have become a permanent feature of the Indian constitution, as confirmed by various rulings of the Supreme Court of India and the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir, the latest of which was in April 2018.

 

Picture Credit : Google

What are CAA and NRC Act 2019?

The National Register for Citizens (NRC) is a register which contains the names of genuine Indian citizenship in the country. NRC was aimed at identifying illegal immigrants who entered and settled in Assam, primarily from Bangladesh, after March 25, 1971 and deporting them to their native country. It was a state-specific exercise to retain the ethnic uniqueness of Assam. The final list of NRC was published on Aug. 31, 2019. A total of 3.29 crore people had applied for the NRC, of which 3.11 crore made it to the final list. Those excluded had to approach the Foreigners’ Tribunals set up across the state for the purpose. The Assam experience has been bad with reports suggesting the exclusion of a large number of genuine residents from the list.

In the meanwhile, the Citizenship (Amendment) Act was passed in Parliament on Dec 12, 2019, leading to widespread protests across the country. It was during a discussion on the Bill that Home Minister Amit Shah had proposed that the NRC be implemented pan-India. According to the CAA, member of Hindu, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain, Parsi and Christian communities who have come from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan till December 31, 2014 and facing religious persecution there will not be treated as illegal immigrants but given Indian citizenship. The law, however, excludes Muslims. The protesters feel the CAA discriminates against Muslims and violates the right to equality enshrined in the Constitution of India.

 

Picture Credit : Google

When was Balakot airstrike done?

The Balakot airstrike took place following days of rising tension between India and Pakistan. The strike was launched on February 26; two weeks after a Jaish-e-Mohammad terrorist rammed an explosive-laden car into a CRPF convoy in J&K’s Pulwama. Forty CRPF jawans were killed in the attack. In response, the Indian Air Force bombed Jaish-e-Mohammad’s largest terror camp located in Balakot in Pakistan’s Kyber Pakhtunkhwa. The following day, Pakistan retaliated by attempting to target India’s military installations. In the aerial combat that followed, a Pakistani F-16 fighter aircraft was downed and an Indian MiG-21 Bison piloted by Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman was shot down. The injured pilot was taken prisoner by Pakistan and was released as a “gesture of peace” two days later, de-escalating tension between the two countries. Subsequently, Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman was awarded the Vir Chakra, India’s third-highest war time gallantry medal.

 

Picture Credit : Google

When POCSO Act made stringent?

The Union Cabinet on Dec 28, 2018 approved amendments to strengthen the POSCO Act and included death penalty for aggravated sexual assault on children, besides providing stringent punishments for other crimes against those aged below 18. The Protection of Children from sexual offences (Amendment) Bill, POSCO, 2019 was passed by Parliament on Aug 1, 2019. It seeks to enhance punishment for sexual offences against children, with a provision of death penalty.

Sections 14 and 15 of the POCSO Act, 2012 are also proposed to be amended to address the menace of the child pornography. It is proposed to levy fine for not destroying or deleting or reporting the pornographic material involving a child, the statement said. The offender can be further penalized with jail term or fine or both for transmitting propagating administrating such material in any manner except for the purpose of reporting as may be prescribed and for use as evidence in court. “Penal provisions have been made more stringent for storing/possessing any pornographic material in any form involving a child for commercial purpose,” the official statement said.

 

Picture Credit : Google

What happened in Doklam standoff?

Tension between India and China escalated over the disputed Doklam on June 16, 2017, When Chinese troops tried to extend a border road through the Doklam area. Indian troops objected to it and the stand-off continued for a couple of months till Aug 28. The stand-off was resolved following mutual withdrawal of troops. The Indian Army is planning to institutionalise the key war committee that was created during the Doklam stand-off. Doklam is an area with a narrow plateau and a valley lying on the Bhutan-China border, near India. An area of strategic importance to all three countries, Doklam in Western Bhutan is disputed between China and Bhutan. India supports Bhutan’s claim.

The Bhutanese government told China that “the construction of the road inside Bhutanese territory is a direct violation of the agreements and affects the process of demarcating the boundary between our two countries.” On June 30, the Ministry of External Affairs said: “Such construction would represent a significant change of status quo with serious security implications for India.”

The Chinese government released a map to accuse India of trespassing into its territory, and in a detailed statement in the first week of August, it said “India has no right to interfere in or impede the boundary talks between China and Bhutan.”

 

Picture Credit : Google

Why GST is introduced?

The Goods and Services Tax, which came into effect on July 1, 2017, is an indirect tax levied on the supply of goods and services across the country. Simply put, it is one uniform indirect tax for the entire country. A comprehensive tax, it has done away with cascading taxes and consolidated Central and State levies. Under the GST, the customer is in a position to source from any supplier and the latter is in a position to access markets across the country.

GST would be levied on the basis of the destination principle. Exports would be zero-rated, and imports would attract tax in the same manner as domestic goods and services. In addition to the IGST in respect of supply of goods, an additional tax of up to 1% has been proposed to be levied by the central government. The revenue from this tax is to be assigned to the origin states. This tax is proposed to be levied for the first two years or a longer period, as recommended by the GST Council.

 

Picture Credit : Google

Who presented Railway Budget 2017?

For the first time, the annual budget for the Union Government was presented on February 1, 2017, a month earlier than usual, by Finance Minister Arun Jaitley in the Lok Sabha. Also, the 92-years-old tradition of presenting the Railway budget ahead of the general budget was discontinued and the Railway budget was merged into the general budget. The decision was taken as part of the government’s budgetary reforms. According to a NITI Aayog report, as the size of the Railway budget had shrunken compared to the general budget, a separate Railway budget was not required.

 This was the largest allocation in the history of Indian Railways. This was a historic moment for the Indian Railways. In the budget of 2017, Jaitley paid special attention to passenger safety, development works, cleanliness and finance and accounting reforms. At the same time, in an unprecedented initiative, Jaitley also proposed listing of railway subsidiaries like IRCTC, IRCON and IRFC in the market.

 

Picture Credit : Google

What are the protests witnessed by the people in India?

The past decade witnessed several protests by the people for a variety of reasons.

2011: When anti-corruption activist Anna Hazare began a hunger strike at Jantar Mantar on April 5, 2011, it led to the resignation of Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar from the group of ministers charged with reviewing the draft Jan Lokpal Bill.

2017: On January 8, 2017, the people of Tamil Nadu erupted in protest against a Supreme Court ban on Jallikattu following complaints of animal cruelty. Contending that the traditional bull-taming sport is quintessential to their cultural identity, people from all walks of life converged near Chennai’s Marina to express solidarity with the protesters. The protests gained momentum and soon spread all over the state. The Tamil Nadu government legalized Jallikattu on January 23, 2017.

2018: Thousand of farmers across the country began their march to Parliament on Nov. 30, 2018 to highlight the worsening agrarian crisis. They wanted their demands – better crop prices, drought relief and loan waivers- discussed in the winter session that year.

2019: Protests continue to rage in the country following the passage of the Citizenship (Amendment) Act in December 2019 and the proposed pan-India NRC.

 

Picture Credit : Google

What is Rafale deal?

In September 2016, India inked a deal with France’s Dassault Aviation for procurement of 36 Rafale fighter jets as an estimated cost of Rs 59,000 crore or 7.8 billion. The original plan of the previous UPA govt was to buy 126 jets of which 18 would be in flyaway condition and the rest would be assembled in India by the state-run Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd (HAL). However, the deal fell through. In order to upgrade the ageing fleet of the IAF, the Modi government entered into the new deal for jets with India-specific enhancements. Besides, an offset clause was added under which France would invest 30% of the 7.8 billion in India’s military aerospace research programmes and 20% into local production of Rafale components. Ever since, questions were raised about the cost agreed upon for the aircraft, violation of procurement procedures, and the choice of Anil Ambani’s Reliance Defence Ltd as an offset partner over the experienced HAL. However, in December 2019, the Supreme Court dismissed all petitions alleging irregularities in the deal. Defence Minister Rajnath Singh received the first of the 36 jets at a ceremony in Paris on October 8, 2019.

 

Picture Credit : Google

What is Demonetisation?

Demonetisation is withdrawal of a particular form of currency from circulation which means it is no longer legal tender. On November 8, 2016, Prime Minister Narendra Modi announced the biggest-ever demonetisation exercise in India. Notes of Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 denomination were scrapped. The move was undertaken to crack down on black money and curb terror funding. Cash shortages ensued, significantly affecting the country’s economy. The RBI’s annual report released months after the exercise said almost 99% (Rs 15.28 lakh crore) of the banned currency notes had been deposited in banks between Nov. 8, 2016 and June 30, 2017. With almost all of the money accounted for, there are doubts whether the exercise was effective.

 

Picture Credit : Google

When did Andhra Pradesh and Telangana caused by extreme heat?

In May 2015, a scorching heat wave killed more than 1,500 people as temperatures soared above 47ºC. Andhra Pradesh and Telangana were the worst-hit regions with more than 1,100 deaths, mainly caused by extreme dehydration and heat stroke. Extreme weather conditions are set to become more common as greenhouse gases heat up the planet say scientists.

Earlier in the decade too (June 2010), a heat wave struck India and South Asia, when temperatures touched 53ºC, killing hundreds of people. Record temperatures in northern India claimed lives in what was believed to be the hottest summer in the country since record began in the late 1800s. More than 100 people died in Gujarat, 90 in Maharashtra, 35 in Rajasthan and 34 in Bihar.

 

Picture Credit : Google

Who won general elections in 2014 India?

The last decade saw two general elections – in 2014 and 2019 – both of which witnessed the victory of the BJP-led NDA.

The 2014 election, held from April 7 to May 12 saw the BJP-led NDA win a sweeping victory gaining 336 of 543 seats of which the BJP won 282 seats (31%), whereas the Congress won 44 seats (8.1%). It was the first time in the history of the country that a non-Congress party had won a simple majority on its own. It was also the Congress’ worst defeat, as it could not qualify to be the official opposition party for which a party should have gained 10% of the seats.

The country went to polls again in April-May 2019. The results saw a landslide victory for the incumbent BJP-led NDA which won 353 seats (of which BJP won 303 seats, a clear majority), while the Opposition UPA –Congress and it allies – secured 9 seats (of which Congress won 52 seats).

 

Picture Credit : Google

When Vyapam scam was broke out?

The Vyqapam scam broke out in 2013 after the Indore police arrested 20 people for impersonating candidates in the Madhya Pradesh Professional Examination Board, popularly known as Vyapam (Vyavsayik Pariksha Mandal). Vyapam held competitive exams for recruitment to government jobs and for admissions to state-run medical colleges. The scam involved recruitment of undeserving candidates who allegedly bribed politicians and officials to get high ranks in the exams. It got murkier when a number of people-whistleblowers, witnesses and alleged beneficiaries-died under mysterious circumstances during the course of the investigations which revealed large-scale fraud committed by multiple rackets for years. In February 2017, the Supreme Court cancelled the degrees of 634 doctors.

 

Picture Credit : Google

What is Nirbhaya case?

In December 2012, Delhi witnessed a horrific crime that sparked anger and outrage across the country. A 23-year-old paramedic student, referred to as Nirbhaya, was gang-raped on a moving bus and assaulted by six persons before being dumped on the road. Nirbhaya did not survive the attack. Changes in the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act 2013 to lay down stringent punishment for sexual offences against women followed. And that’s how the law came to popularly referred to as ‘The Nirbhaya Act’. Subsequently, the Nirbhaya Fund was created to be utilized for projects meant to improve safety of women in public places.

One of the six accused in the Nirbhaya case, Ram Singh, allegedly committed suicide in the Tihar Jail. A juvenile accused was released from a reformation home after serving a three-year term. A Delhi court issued death warrants all four convicts in the case and ordered they be hanged on Feb 1.

 

Picture Credit : Google

Why is political party funding?

Political party funding is the means which a party raises money for its functioning and campaigns. Party members, individual supporters, organisations which support a party or its ideologies or which could benefit from the party’s victory, contribute to this funding. Political parties can also receive foreign funds.

Parties need money to reach voters, to advertise in print, electronic and social media, to pay party workers and to organise election rallies. (in the 2019 general election, a staggering Rs 55,000-60,000 crore was spent by the political parties on election-related activities, according to a study by the Centre for Media Studies (CMS), a not-for-profit multi-disciplinary development research think-tank. The Bharatiya Janata Party spent about 45% of this total amount!).

 

Picture Credit : Google

What are political parties and pressure groups?

               The origin of social science and art of politics can be traced back to the times of Aristotle. In his opinion, politics was a prime subject which he used for finding an ideal set of rules for attitudes, values and firm beliefs of human society. In late 15th century a French philosopher Montaigne pointed out that ‘Liberty’ is the key concern of all human beings.

               Later thinkers like John Stuart Mill and Karl Marx made significant contributions to the study of politics — although in a different ideological leanings. These beliefs or ideas ultimately led to the formation of political parties or groups. Now the question arises: what are the goals and functions of an ideal political party? According to social scientists political parties serve as dynamic agents within different political systems. They formulate policies of a government of their own party and set goals for the welfare of society which according to them would be best suited for their people. All political parties are supposed to bridge the gaps between rulers and the ruled. The mode of political systems however, differs from country to country. 

Continue reading “What are political parties and pressure groups?”

What are the two houses of our parliament?

            The parliament or the Central Legislature of India consists of the President and the two Houses: The Rajya Sabha (the Upper House) and The Lok Sabha (the Lower House).

            The President is an integral part of our parliamentary democracy, but it is still in many ways above the parliament. All bills passed by the parliament must have his assent before they become law. The parliament has to meet atleast twice a year and at an interval of not more than six months.

            The maximum strength of the Lok Sabha is 545 (525 from the States and 20 from the Union Territories), and of the Rajya Sabha 250 (12 nominated). 

            The Lok Sabha, whose life is five years after every general election, is the lower house of the parliament and comprises members directly elected by the people. Every citizen of India who is 18 years of age or above has been given the right to vote. To qualify as a candidate for election to the Lok Sabha, one must be a citizen of India and should not be less than 25 years of age. He should also possess qualifications prescribed by the parliament. The Lok Sabha elects two of its members as Speaker and Deputy Speaker for a term in consistent with the life of the Lok Sabha. The Speaker is the presiding officer of the Lok Sabha. He does not vote but can use his vote in case of a tie. He presides over the joint sitting of the Lok Sabha and the Rajya Sabha. The Speaker or the Deputy Speaker does not preside when a resolution for his removal is discussed in the House. The Lok Sabha can be dissolved before the stipulated or due time.

            The Rajya Sabha is the upper house of the parliament, and is made up of representatives from the states or the constituent units of the Indian Union. It is a permanent body, one-third of its members retiring every two years. Thus every member enjoys a six – year term. The Rajya Sabha cannot be dissolved since it is a permanent body. To qualify for election to the Rajya Sabha, the candidate should be a citizen of India, and not less than 30 years of age. He should possess such other qualifications as may be prescribed, under any law made by the parliament. The Vice-President is the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha. The Deputy Chairman is elected from amongst the members of the Rajya Sabha.

            The Lok Sabha is more powerful than the Rajya Sabha. No bill can become a law, until it has been passed by it. The Lok Sabha shares with the Rajya Sabha the power of amending the constitution. It can also initiate a charge of impeachment against the President. The elected members of this house form a part of the Electoral College for the election of the President. The Vice-President is also elected by members of this house jointly with the members of the Rajya Sabha.

            No bill can become a law unless it has been passed by the Rajya Sabha. It shares the power with the Lok Sabha to amend the constitution. It can also introduce any bill except a money bill. No money bill can originate in the Rajya Sabha. All money bills passed by the Lok Sabha are sent to the Rajya Sabha for its recommendations. Such bills should be returned within 14 days, otherwise, they are deemed to have been passed. The members of the Rajya Sabha take part in the election of the President and the Vice-President. 

 

Origin of the Labour Party

 The Labour Party grew out of the trade union movement and socialist political parties of the 19th century before the First World War. Although after 1825, workers were allowed to form associations, they could not strike for their cause, and unions were not protected by law. However, after 1850, with the entry of mass production techniques, the Industrial Revolution entered a new phase. The number of unions grew, even in towns. New political ideas emerged, due to Socialism, which stressed on equality among men. The 1874 elections saw two workers entering parliament, and slowly, their numbers rose in the coming years.

 Initially, though these men supported the Liberal Party, slowly another group emerged within the union with the support of eminent personalities like Bernard Shaw. The Labour Representation Committee was formed in 1893 to select candidates to stand for the polls for the parliament, and in 1900, the Independent Labour Party was formed, heralding a new era in the history of parliament. The party primarily served the poor working class, the aged, and sought the intervention the government to protect the workers in the new industrial society.

The Labour Party grew steadily, and was dedicated to the cause of the workers.

In 1919, the first Labour government under Ramsay Macdonald assumed office, and the Labour Party became a leading political party in Britain.

 

Suffragettes and Women’s Votes

The members of the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU) founded by Mrs. Pankhurst in 1904 were called Suffragettes. This was formed to fight for women’s right to vote and for equal status with men. The suffragettes at first, tried peaceful means, through speeches, pamphlets and demonstrations. Upon getting no attention from the parliament, they resorted to more extreme measures like breaking windows, burning empty houses and even chaining themselves to the railings of Hyde Park. However during the First World War in 1914, the suffragettes abandoned their campaign to actively support the war effort. These acts persuaded the government to allow women over thirty to vote in 1918, and later in 1928, women were given equal status with men, and could vote at the age of 21. 

What was the Parliament Bill?

 The Lords always posed difficulties, whenever the Liberals tried to pass a bill to reform legislation. It got so bad that, at one point, the government decided to put an end to this. The Parliament Bill was thus a weapon to limit the powers of the Lords, especially in matters pertaining to finance and its prominence in legislation. When the Lords attempted to stop this bill’s passage, the then Prime Minister Asquith appealed to King George V for help. The king promised the PM, that if necessary, he would create enough new Liberal peers to vote for the approval of the bill. The Lords of course, took a tough stance. The PM again went to the polls in December 1910, and won a clear majority. The king’s promise was made public, and the Lords had to concede. On August 10th, 1911, the Parliament Bill became law.

Why did the nineteenth century see further electoral changes?

Between 1832 and 1918, the British electoral system was transformed. Each electoral reform, by itself, may not seem very dramatic, but taken together, the series of reforms passed during the period was surely revolutionary. One reform led to another. After the First and Second Reform Acts, an act was passed in 1883 to limit the expenses of election candidates. In 1884, the vote was extended to all householders in the counties. Standing for election, and voting at elections, was no longer the privilege of the rich. By 1918, three-quarters of the adult population could vote, and vote freely, for a range of candidates. This meant that politicians had to work harder to win votes. They had to travel around the country, meeting ordinary people to ask for their votes. Parliament had at last, become truly democratic.

Why did the Conservatives introduce the Second Reform Act?

The 1867 Reform Act was the second major attempt to reform Britain’s electoral process. By this time, party names had changed. The Tories were now called the Conservative Party, and the Whigs changed their name to the Liberal Party. It was the Conservatives under Benjamin Disraeli who promoted the Second Reform Act, believing that it would help to win the support of the middle classes.

 The 1867 Reform Act gave the vote to every male adult householder living in a borough constituency. Male lodgers paying £10 for unfurnished rooms were also granted the vote. Fifty-two seats were redistributed from small towns with populations less than 10,000 to the growing industrial towns or counties. This gave the vote to about 1,500,000 men.

 Though the Second Reform Act gave voting power to more people, Disraeli had miscalculated its effect. In the next election in 1868, the Liberal Party defeated the Conservative Party, and came to power. 

Why was the First Reform Act passed?

The First Reform Act of 1832 was one of the most important changes in the history of British politics. It was necessary because the electoral system had remained virtually unchanged since the late 1680’s, while the country’s economy, class system, and political methods had changed immeasurably in that time.

The Industrial Revolution had created a new economy and caused the emergence of new cities such as Manchester and Birmingham, where the new factories were centred. However, according to the old electoral system of 1682, these new towns had no political representation.

 Moreover, the vote was only open to landowners, meaning that almost 95 percent of the population had no say in political matters. The vote was done in an open vote, a process that led to corruption.

 When the Whigs came to power in 1829, they were aware of the level of discontent in the country as a whole, and wanted to enact a moderate reform that would make the system fairer. So, the First Reform Act was passed in which six small boroughs lost both their seats, and another thirty lost a seat each. The seats gained in this way were redistributed among the new boroughs. In addition to landlords, leaseholders and householders paying more than a minimum specified amount were also eligible to vote. As a result, more people got the right to vote.

 

When were journalists allowed into the British Parliament?

 Till 1778, the common man did not know much about what happened inside parliament. However, that changed when journalists were allowed into the House of Commons in 1778. From 1783, newspapers began to print reports of the debates in parliament. This was a very important development, as Englishmen could now know what exactly their lawmakers were up to. If they read that parliament was not acting in their best interests, they could complain and take action. Parliament thus became   more responsible to the people, and the newspapers also became more powerful as they played a role in moulding public opinion. 

How did George III try to control Parliament?

George III ascended the throne in 1760, upon the sudden death of his grandfather, Georg II. He was a member of the House of Hanover, a noble German family that succeeded to the British throne in 1714. George wanted to play an active role in the government- and he wanted to get rid of the Whigs, who had become very corrupt. The Tory party, after an Long exile from power, was now rapidly gaining ground. George III took advantage of these conditions, and, putting himself at the head of the Tories, attempted to become the real master in English politics. He chose new ministers- but soon found that he needed the support of the House of Commons to carry out his policies. To get this support, he had to bribe the members- and so finally, George III, who wanted to fight corruption, ended up by using bribery and corruption to get what he wanted! In fact, in the purchase of seats in the Commons for his favorites he outdid the Whigs in the worst days of their corruption.

Why was the Cabinet Council important?

      In England, the king always had a small body of advisors or a council to help him to carry out his duties. This was known as the Privy Council. During the reign of Queen Anne, a new council emerged. It consisted of a group of men each of whom was entrusted with the responsibility of running one of the government departments. This was called the Cabinet Council. The Cabinet Council became the real source of power as time passed and it is the fore runner of the modern cabinet.

Why was the Act of Settlement important?

      On 12 June 1701, the English Parliament passed an act to lay down the conditions for the succession to the throne of Great Britain. This has often been called the Act of Settlement or the Act of Settlement 1701. It was also extended to cover Scotland. Do you know why this act was passed?

            William III and Mary II had ruled England as joint sovereigns. Then Mary II died without any children, and William III did not marry again until he died. The throne of England went to Mary’s sister Anne, who also did not have any heirs. Consequently, a new law was needed to make sure that the throne would continue to have a Protestant reign after Anne.

            This was the background under which Parliament passed The Act of Settlement in 1701. The act laid down the conditions under which alone the crown could be held. No Roman Catholic, nor anyone married to a Roman Catholic, could hold the English Crown. The sovereign also had to swear to maintain the Church of England. The purpose of the Act was to ensure the Protestant succession to the throne, and to strengthen the parliament system of government.

Royal Veto

 In 1688, parliament brought about the deposition of James II, and invited William III and Mary II of Orange to the English throne as joint sovereigns. This is known as the Glorious or Bloodless Revolution. After this revolution, Parliament became very powerful, but the monarch could still reject legislation brought up by parliament by exercising what was called the royal veto. The word ‘veto’ is Latin for ‘I forbid’ and William used it on four occasions. Although, in theory, the royal veto still exists, it was used for the last time in 1708, by Queen Anne.

 

Why was the Civil List created?

 The history of the civil list dates from the reign of William and Mary in 18th century England. Before this, there had been no distinction between the expenses of government in time of peace and the personal expenses of the king. The civil list is the grant made by parliament for the monarch’s personal support, and for that of the royal household.

 The custom of the Civil List dates to 1689, when Parliament, on the accession of William and Mary, voted £600,000 specifically for civil expenses. Through the first Civil List Act in 1697, revenues estimated to yield about £700,000 were assigned to the monarch to cover the royal expenses. The amount was to be used for the payment of government officials, and the up-keep of the royal house.

 At first, the Civil List was revised from time to time. Later, during the reign of George I, the Civil List became a fixed sum, with Parliament paying any debts that were incurred. The Civil List assured a permanent income for the monarch- and at the same time, it ensured that a king could not rule without the help and support of the parliament.

Battle of Naseby

Charles I went to war against the parliament in 1642, and England was plunged into a Civil War for the next three years. The parliamentary army of about 14,000, led by Sir Thomas Fairfax, defeated about 8,000 Royalists, commanded by King Charles I, near the North amptonshire village of Naseby. The Royalists lost nearly all their arms and artillery, and thousands of their men were taken prisoner. One year after Naseby, Charles surrendered to Scotland, who in turn, handed Charles over to the English Parliament.

Why the parliament of November 1640 was called ‘The Long Parliament’?

The Long Parliament was first called by King Charles I on 3rd November 1640, six months after the dissolution of the Short Parliament, and within weeks of the defeat of the English against Scotland. The king was reluctant to summon another parliament, but the expense of the wars had left him desperately short of money and in urgent need of parliamentary subsidies. The Long Parliament met from 1640 to 1653 and from 1659 to 1660. 

The Long Parliament was first convened in 1640, and under the leadership of John Pym and John Hampden, it passed a series of bills designed to weaken the power of the king. After Charles tried to arrest Pym, Hampden, and three other members of the House of Commons, civil war broke out. With the help of the Scots, parliament defeated the forces of King Charles, and he was captured in 1646.

 Meanwhile, the Independents, made up of the Puritans in parliament led by Oliver Cromwell, had become very powerful. Civil war broke out again, time over the issue of religion. The Independents won in 1648. In 1649, parliament abolished the monarchy and the House of Lords, and established the court that had Charles put to death.

In 1653, Cromwell forced parliament to disband. After his death the remaining members of the Long Parliament reconvened. They were persuaded to make way for a newly elected parliament in 1660. 

The Short Parliament!

       After eleven years of ruling without a parliament, Charles was forced to call the parliament in April 1640, as he needed money desperately to pay his troops. Parliament however, refused to cooperate with him, until he settled all its grievances. An angry king dissolved the parliament in just three weeks. Since it met for such a short time, this parliament is referred to as ‘The Short Parliament’. 

Why did Charles I agree to the Petition of Right?

Charles I became King of England in 1625. He had problems with Parliament from the very beginning, because, his wife was French, and parliament resented his support of France. When parliament refused to grant him the money he wanted, he dissolved it and started collecting taxes illegally. Those who refused to pay were thrown into prison.

            However, even these harsh steps failed to get Charles the money he needed, so he was forced to call parliament again in 1628. The House of Commons took this opportunity to force Charles to accept a document called the Petition of Rights. The petition restated some of the ancient rights and privilege of Englishmen. It declared that no free man could be thrown into prison without a trial and that the king could not collect any tax without the consent of parliament. The petition also forbade the use of private homes to house soldiers without payment, and reminded the king that he was not above the law of the land.

Charles I agreed to the petition and parliament voted him the revenues he sought. Shortly after-wards, however, the king dismissed parliament, and rejected the petition. He ruled for the next eleven years without summoning parliament.

 

Ship Money

During the 1630’s, Charles I experimented with a number of ways to raise money without calling the parliament. One of this ways was to insist on Ship Money. This was a system by which English ports were forced to build and equip warships – or pay an equivalent amount of money as tax. However, when Charles tried to extend the practice to inland towns as well, there was an uproar, which finally led to a court battle. 

Why did the Commons oppose monopolies?

 Do you know what a monopoly is? It is an exclusive right given to an individual or company to trade in a particular commodity. Traditionally, monarchs sold these monopolies or exclusive rights, and the sale of monopolies provided them with a lot of money.

The House of Commons began to attack this practice of selling monopolies, on the grounds that it made things more expensive. Playing cards and dice were two of the commodities on which Elizabeth issued a monopoly, but others were on more necessary items such as vinegar, starch, sweet wines, and salt. By 1601, protests were so strong that Elizabeth was forced to yield to the demands of the House and repeal, or take back all the monopolies that had been granted.

Why did Elizabeth I clash with the Commons?

During Elizabeth’s reign, the House of Commons became increasingly confident and assertive. Soon after Elizabeth became queen of England, the Protestants gained full control of parliament. It now became very important to parliament that Elizabeth marry. The Queen did not like it when they tried to discuss her personal life, but the House of Commons insisted that it had the right to do so, because, its members were guaranteed freedom of speech.

 Elizabeth clashed with the Commons on other issues too. Although she agreed that its members had complete freedom of speech, she believed that certain issues such as religion or foreign policy were best left to her and her Privy Council. On thirty-six occasions, Elizabeth even vetoed laws passed by parliament. 

How did the religious changes in the mid sixteenth century affect parliament?

          The mid sixteenth century was a time of religious upheaval in England. Henry VIII had broken away from the Catholic Church in Rome, and established the Church of England. The break with Rome, known as the Reformation, changed the country forever, and also left Henry’s children with an England deeply divided over religion.

            Under Henry’s son Edward VI, the Protestants became powerful. However, Henry’s daughter Mary was a devout Catholic.

 Parliament during this time went along with the changes in religious policy. Stability was restored only when Henry’s daughter, Elizabeth, came to the throne. She was a Protestant, but she allowed the religious conflicts to cool down, and peace was restored.  

 

Puritanism

Puritanism was a form of Christianity that came to England around 1563 AD. The Puritans believed that God wanted them to lead quiet, simple, serious lives. They spent a lot of their time praying, reading the Bible, and listening to sermons. They did not, have parties, listen to music, or dance. They did not celebrate holidays, not even Christmas or Easter. The growing numbers of Puritans in the house of Commons caused Elizabeth I a lot of trouble. 

Thomas Cromwell and Parliament

 Thomas Cromwell was a great states-man and, in his decade of power, he permanently changed the course of English history. He was an elected member of the parliament of 1529, and he used his position to influence the Commons on behalf of the government. Henry VIII was able to get parliament to do what he wanted because of the power and influence of Thomas Cromwell. 

Why was Sir Thomas More beheaded?

Sir Thomas More was an advisor to King Henry VIII. He disapproved of the king divorcing his first wife Catherine of Aragon in order to marry Anne Boleyn, without the approval of the Pope. Moore was a devout Catholic, and believed deeply in the supremacy of the Pope. In 1532, when he saw that King Henry was determined to marry Anne Boleyn and that divorce was in the air, he claimed ill health and retired, rather than stay in the king’s cabinet.

Things became worse when the king invited him to his marriage with Boleyn, and More declined to attend. He was summoned to the court to answer an obscure charge of accepting a bribe, which was later dropped. Henry then passed a law which declared him supreme ruler of the world, baring none, including the Pope. All citizens were to take an oath recognizing this, but More refused.

Henry VIII threw him into the Tower of London, where for a whole year, he was locked up. His wife and children visited him and begged him to take the oath, but More refused on principle. He was tried for treason, found guilty, and beheaded. 

Henry VIII and Parliament

            Henry VII’s son, Henry VIII demanded enormous sums of money from parliament to renew the wars with France. The House of Commons refused, and finally, after much debate, Henry got only half of what he asked for. This proved that the Commons was still in control of taxation, even during the reign of a powerful monarch. Henry also had to work closely with parliament, in order to lead England away from the Catholic Church which had refused to grant him a divorce from his wife Catherine.

Why was Henry VII able to control the parliament?

 Henry VII became King of England in 1485. One of the main goals of Henry VII was to restore royal authority while England recovered from the War of the Roses. His biggest problem was that there were too many nobles in England, and he needed to check their power. To do this, he used the parliament to pass an act called the Star Chamber Act. This act set up a special court to try the wealthy and the powerful for offences, since ordinary courts be afraid to punish them.

Henry also realized that to have control over the government, he had to have control over parliament. Henry had already shown the nobility that loyalty to him would be rewarded, and this gave him control over the House of Lords. The Commons – primarily made up of rich merchants – was gaining in power around the time of Henry. Henry was smart enough to recognize their importance to the growth of England’s economy. He took good care to maintain a good relationship with the representatives of the middle classes in Parliament, and to get them on his side. By protecting of interests of the middle classes and merchants, he began to make England a centre for trade and commerce.

 Henry rarely needed parliament to grant him money for wars abroad as he avoided expensive overseas military campaigns. Parliament was used to support Henry’s drive to increase the king’s power, and to some extent, parliament became a rubber stamp for Henry.

Big Ben

 Big Ben is possibly London’s most famous landmark. The 98 metres high clock tower is named after the largest bell weighing over 13 tonnes. The clock tower was completed in 1859 and the great clock started on 31st May, with the great bell’s strike heard for the first time on 11th July the quarter bells first chimed on 7th September. Each clock face is over 7 metres in diameter. Old pennies act as counter- weights to ensure Big Ben keeps time to the nearest second.

Why is the Palace of Westminster known as the House of Parliament?

 The Palace of Westminster is the seat of Britain’s two houses of parliament, the House of Lords, and the House of Commons, and so it is more commonly known as the House of Parliament. It is located on the left bank of the River Thames in the borough of Westminster, London. The building, now considered one of the finest gothic structures in the world, has had a turbulent history which has included destruction by fire and bombing.

 Westminster was originally a royal residence. In 1512, the palace suffered greatly from fire. It was rebuilt, and in 1530, when King Henry moved his residence to Whitehall Palace, the House of Lords continued to meet in Westminster Palace. In 1547, the House of Commons also moved here, and Westminster Palace became the seat of government.

 Westminster was destroyed by a fire in 1834, but was rebuilt again, and work was finished by 1860. The Commons Chamber was burned out in one of the numerous air raids that targeted London during World War II, but it was restored and reopened in 1950. 

Why was Edward IV able to make himself independent of parliament?

 Edward IV became King of England with the support of parliament. He is respected for bringing stability back to government after a decade of civil strife during the initial Wars of the Roses. Since the war with France was also over, Edward IV had gained many estates, and he was a very rich man indeed. As a result, he began to become more and more independent of parliament. In fact, during the twenty two years of his reign, parliament was called only seven times.

Most people were happy with this arrangement at that time, since Edward lived on the revenue produced by his own lands. He did not over tax his subjects, and the people who were tired of the burdens of war, were content to let him reign independent of parliament. 

Why were acts of attainder passed during the Wars of the Roses?

 The Wars of the Roses were a series of battles that were fought in England between two great houses or families. They were the House of Lancaster, whose supporters were called Lancastrians, and the House of York, whose supporters were the Yorkists. The battles were called the Wars of the Roses because the Yorkists were represented by a white rose and the Lancastrians by a red rose. This long civil war lasted from AD 1455-1485. Almost all the rich people in England chose sides, and during the wars, parliament kept changing sides.

 During the Wars of the Roses, the winning side would use what was known as acts of attainder to strip the losers of all their property. By this act, those in power could convict their political enemies of treason, without bringing them to trial. By passing a bill of attainder, parliament simply declared anyone named in the act to be guilty of treason. Parliament could then take away all their civil rights and property, Between 1459 and 1500, parliament stripped 400 persons of their property and rights using acts of attainder. However, when those that lost came into power, they would promptly reverse the act of attainder, and take back whatever they had lost.

Why was freedom of speech important?

 Henry Bolingbroke, son of John Gaunt, became Henry IV, King of England after deposing, Richard II. Parliament played an important role in making him the king, and so, Henry IV was willing to agree to its many demands. One of these demands was that the members of parliament be given the freedom to discuss, and speak on any matter without fear of arrest. In effect, the House of Commons was asking for freedom of speech, and Henry agreed to this request. So, the reign of Henry IV saw the foundation laid for one of the most scared privileges of democracy today- freedom of speech. 

Why did the Commons turn against Richard II?

Following the death of his grandfather, Edward Ill in June, 1377, Richard II was crowned King of England at the age of ten. At that time, his uncle John Gaunt was involved in a tussle for power with parliament. As he grew older, Richard, like his uncle and grandfather before him, wanted to rule without being controlled by the parliament. This angered the members of the House of Commons. To make matters worse, Richard granted favours generously to his friends and supporters. The House of Commons disapproved of this, and in 1386, it wanted to impeach both the Chancellor and Treasurer.

 Richard at first arrogantly refused to allow the impeachment- in fact he is reported to have said that he would not dismiss even a single kitchen hand at parliament’s request! However, he finally had to give in, and allow the impeachment. Two years later, parliament executed six of the king’s friends and supporters, and for the next ten years, the king was forced to co-operate with parliament. It was a bitter and humiliating lesson for the monarch, and this period saw parliament grow even stronger than before. 

Why is Peter de Ia Mare famous?

 Sir Peter de Ia Mare was an English politician who is best remembered as the Presiding Officer of the House of Commons during the Good Parliament of 1376. Soon after parliament was called, its members chose Sir Peter to be their spokesman. He thus became the first man to be recognized as Speaker of the House of Commons.

 Sir Peter played an important role in the impeachment of various corrupt officials, including the close friends of the king. However, he was later imprisoned by John Gaunt, the third son of the king, to whom the king had handed over the reins of government. The impeachments were also reversed by the next parliament, which was packed with Gaunt’s supporters.

Why did Edward ll’s reign mark the increasing power of parliament?

Edward II succeeded to the throne upon his father’s death in 1307. His reign was one of constant struggle with the barons. In this struggle, Edward was defeated, and thrown into prison. The question now became what to do with him. The simplest solution was to have Edward put to death. The problem was that the execution of Edward II would necessitate a trial. While there was general agreement that Edward had not paid proper attention to the needs of his subjects, his actions were not considered treas on. The situation was further complicated by the fact that legal power and the ability to set royal policy still rested with Edward even though he was in jail!

In light of these circumstances, parliament chose to act as an authority above the king. Representatives were summoned to the House of Commons, and the debate began.

Eventually, parliament agreed to remove Edward from power. However, Edward was not deposed. Rather, parliament’s decision was presented to Edward, who was asked to accept it. His abdication was announced on January 24, 1327, and it heralded the increasing power and importance of parliament in governing England. 

Why did parliament split up into two groups during the Middle Ages?

Edward Ill came to the throne in 1327, and from that point, the representatives of the counties who were called the knights of the shire and of the towns who were the burgesses, became a permanent part of parliament.

When parliament opened, the Chancellor would explain to all the members why they had been summoned. The parliament would then split up. The Lords and important church officials would meet with the king and his council in the council chamber, while the lower clergy, knights, and elected representatives of towns and counties or burgesses would meet in another place. Both groups would discuss the royal requests separately, and then meet again to make their speeches.

Thus, two distinct houses of parliament emerged by the 14th century. One was composed of the elected representatives of the towns and counties. This became known as the Lower House, or House of Commons. The other was composed of religious leaders and nobility. This was the House of Lords, or Upper House. There is no doubt that the early parliaments were dominated by the king and his council, and the role of the House Commons was limited to presenting petitions.

Why did Edward I encourage the development of parliament?

Edward I, Henry III’s son, made the meeting of parliament a more frequent event and over the course of his reign of 35 years, he summoned it on 46 occasions. He was not a democrat, but he saw that parliament was necessary if he was to raise enough money to carry out his policies and to conduct his war with France.

In 1275, Edward I called his first parliament. He summoned nobles and churchmen, but also included the knights from different counties. In addition, he issued writs for two representatives from each city or town -known as the burgesses-to attend. They were called on primarily to listen to and approve the king’s plan for a new tax. Over the following years, it became an accepted rule that the representatives of those who were going to be most affected by taxation had to give their consent to it in parliament. However, the practice of summoning these representatives of the people did not become standard till 1295, when the Model Parliament was called.

 

Why was the parliament of 1265 important?

During the thirteenth century, in England, the word ‘parliament’ often referred to the assemblies that were summoned by the king. These assemblies acted as a session of the nobility. However, when Simon de Montfort came to power, he needed the support of all the people. He summoned the Great Council more frequently. In 1265, in addition to the Lords, he also included burgesses from the towns. The burgesses were the representatives of the ordinary people.

The parliament of 1265, therefore, marks a great advance in the constitutional history of England. The old council of the king had been strictly an assembly of nobles. At its meetings, the ordinary people were not expected to be present. The parliament of 1265 marks the first time that ordinary people were represented at the assemblies. This gathering set a precedent for the future, and in this sense, perhaps, Simon may be called the ‘creator of the House of Commons’.

 

Simon de Montfort

Simon de Montfort was a Frenchman who married King Henry III’s sister. He owned land in England, and became the Earl of Leicester. Simon considered Henry unfit to rule, and led a group of barons who forced the Provisions of Oxford on the king. When Henry refused to rule according to the Provisions, Simon ultimately led a baronial rebellion. He managed to capture the king at the Battle of Lewes. He then governed England as a military dictator for a short time. 

Henry III

Henry III was a 13th century English king who came to the throne at an early age. His reign was marked by strife with barons, led by Simon de Montfort. By 1258, the situation had worsened, and Henry was forced to agree to the Provisions of Oxford. This was a document out-lining reforms to English Common Law. The reforms reinforced and refined many of the principles laid down in the Magna Carta, paving the way for greater rights and freedoms for the common man. 

Why were there changes in the development of the English Parliament in the 13th century?

The 13th century saw many changes in the English way of life. The feudal system began slowly breaking up. Trade and industry grew by leaps and bounds, and the towns were also becoming bigger and more prosperous.

 The most powerful king in medieval English history was Edward I who lived in the 13th century. He was perhaps the most brilliant at consolidating power. The institution he invented to achieve this end was the parliament. The purpose of parliament was to gather all the major vassals of the king in one place, explain to them the reasons for collecting taxes, and get their approval.

 The entire purpose of the development of parliament was efficiency. Eventually, however, after the reign of Edward, parliament would develop as a powerful check on the monarch’s power, though this had not been Edward’s intention.

 

Why did King John sign the Magna Carta?

King John was a very unpopular monarch who came to the throne of England in 1199. The lords of England hated John, because he taxed everyone heavily, and was generally a weak and nasty ruler. By 1215, the English lords had enough of his misrule, and they got together an army and marched to London. John was forced to sign the paper they put in front of him, which is known as The Magna Carta. Did you know that Magna Carta means ‘Great Letter’ in Latin? The Magna Carta is one of the most important documents in history. It guaranteed the people certain rights, and bound the king to certain laws. To begin with, the king had to obey the law, like other people. Moreover, if the king broke the law, the lords had the right to remove that king. In particular, the king could not collect new taxes. After writing the document, these nobles forced King John to sign it, on the threat of civil war. Their intention was only to protect the rights of nobles. Nevertheless, in time, the rights established by the Magna Carta were also extended to commoners. The Magna Carta was signed at Runnymede, Surrey, and South England in 1215.

Why did Henry II bring about many reforms in government?

Henry II, who came to the throne of England in 1154, was one of the most effective of all England’s monarchs. He ruled over an empire that included half of France as well as England, Wales and Scotland. This meant that he had to travel a lot, and while he was away, he wanted a government that would function well in his absence.

The chief officers in the kingdom were the Chancellor, the Keeper of the Privy Seal, and the Treasurer. They looked after all affairs of the state. Henry instituted many reforms to weaken traditional feudal ties and strengthen his position. Unauthorized castles built during the previous reign were razed. Monetary payments replaced military service as the primary duty of those under him. The exchequer, which looked after the king’s financial affairs, was revitalized to enforce accurate record keeping and tax collection. Henry empowered a new social class of government clerks that stabilized procedure.

Henry is considered to be the founder of English Common Law. 

Why did the Norman Conquest bring about changes in government?

 After the last Anglo-Saxon king died in England, several people claimed the throne. One was the late king’s cousin, William, Duke of Normandy. He invaded England, and at the Battle of Hastings in 1066, William defeated another rival for the throne. William was then crowned King of England.

To keep all his Norman nobles happy and to thank them for their help, William took all the land away from the Saxon church officials and nobles, and gave it all to his Norman friends.

 William set up his own council of Norman nobles and bishops. He called it the Great Council. The Great Council grew to become an important part of government. By the 1200’s, the Great Council was called parliament. It is still called parliament today.

 William ordered a survey of all the lands and other assets of his new subjects, detailing who owned what. This is known as the ‘Doomsday Book’. His magistrates used this information to levy taxes more effectively. 

Oldest Parliaments

The Althing in Iceland, founded in the year AD 930, is usually given the credit of being the world’s oldest parliament. At the beginning it was a general assembly of freemen to vote and discuss issues of common concern. The Althing was suspended from 1800 to 1845.The world’s oldest continuous parliament is a title claimed by the Tynwald in the Isle of Man, which dates back to AD 979. But actually, lots of civilizations throughout history, like the Mesopotamian and Indus civilizations, have also claimed to have had parliaments. 

 

Why do we say that the origin of parliaments can be traced to Anglo Saxon times?

Though the first modern parliament can be traced back to the Curia Regis in 13th century England, the origins of parliament go back to the sixth century when England was ruled by Anglo Saxon tribes. In each of the Anglo Saxon kingdoms, an assembly called the Witenagemot existed. It was composed of important churchmen, earls, and other members of the nobility.

 The Witenagemot had considerable powers. The advices of the group were usually sought by the king in matters of laws, taxes, foreign negotiations, and national defense. The word Witenagemot is a combination of two old English words, ‘Witen’ which means wise men, and ‘gemot’ which means meeting- so the Witenagemot was considered to be a meeting of wise men.

 

When was the first modern parliament established?

 The beginning of the modern parliament can be traced back to the 13th century when a council, known as the Curia Regis, or Great Council, advised the king. The Curia Regis was made up of noblemen and church officials. It was in fact, an English court, and it assumed this name during the reign of Henry II. It was called Curia or Aula Regis because it was held in the great hall of the king’s palace.

At first, the king administered justice in person. Later, justice was administered by the king’s judges. The judges who sat in this court were called ‘justices’. Besides these justices, the chief justice the steward of all England, the chancellor, the chamberlain, and the treasurer also took part in the proceedings of this court. The institution known as the parliament developed gradually from the Curia Regis. 

Why the British Parliament is called the ‘mother of parliaments’?

The British Parliament was once described as the ‘mother of parliaments’ by the nineteenth century radical John Bright. It is one of the models of democratic government followed by many countries throughout the world, and is result of over 800 years of development and honoured tradition. During its first 400 years, Parliament developed from being the royal debating chamber or, the King’s Great Council, to becoming one of the nation’s key political institutions.

The British Parliament has influenced democratic systems in America and in many European countries, as well as Australia, New Zealand and Canada. In fact, most of the nations that were once part of the British Empire-including India- have parliaments and constitutions that are inspired by the British parliament.

The Word ‘Parliament’

 The French word ‘parler’ means to talk and ‘parlement’ means to parley, or consult, or hold a conference. In time, the word ‘parlement’ came to denote a conference between the king and his chief subjects.

 The word ‘parliament’ came into usage between 1258 and 1265. This was the period when Simon de Montfort, the most notable English statesman of his era, gained fame as a political reformer. Although he was born into the French aristocracy, Simon de Montfort moved to England during the reign of Henry Ill to claim an inherited title. Simon led a movement to limit the king’s governing powers, and, after an armed revolt, ruled England for about a year. He ruled with the help of a body known as the ‘Great Council’, and soon, the most important meetings of the Great Council became known as parliaments.

 

Why was the Roman Republic not a true democracy?

Around 500 BC, the Roman aristocrats, who were rich landowners, decided they didn’t want to be ruled by kings anymore. These rich people wanted more power for themselves. But they couldn’t get rid of the kings all by themselves. They needed the poor men to fight for them. So, they promised the poor men that they would have a lot of power in the new government; if they would help get rid of the kings.

But once the kings were out, the Roman aristocrats didn’t want to give the poor men any power. So, the leaders of the poor men moved out-side the city, and went on strike. They refused to work anymore unless they got some power. The Roman aristocrats had to give in to them, and this was the beginning of the Roman Republic.

However, the Roman Republic was not a democracy. It consisted of patricians- or the rich and powerful families- and the plebeians, or ordinary farmers and merchants. Only patricians were allowed into the Roman Senate, which made all the important decisions. This made the plebeians very unhappy, and they demanded more rights. They made the aristocrats agree that the poor men could also elect representatives called tribunes.

Tribunes had to be chosen from the poor people, and they went to all the meetings of the Senate. They could veto anything the Senate did which would be detrimental to the interests of the poor people. Veto means ‘I forbid it’ in Latin and it meant that the tribunes could forbid any law that was bad for the poor. 

Why Greece is called the birth-place of democracy?

You all know that India is a democracy, but do you know what a democracy is? Democracy, in Greek, means the rule of the people. In a democracy, the government is run by the people, and the citizens make their own laws. The earliest democracy in the world began in Athens in 510 BC.

 However, Athens did not always have a democracy. In the beginning it was ruled by a king, or monarch, and this system of government is called a monarchy. Later, soldiers handpicked a new leader and put him in power. The leader would do what was best for him and the soldiers. This system, which is known as a tyranny, was quite often unjust and oppressive. By 800 BC, yet another form of government was established in Athens. It was the rule by a few rich and powerful families, and this system, known as an oligarchy, was not fair either. The Athenians decided that they wanted a just and fair means of government, and so, democracy was born.

In Athens, democracy meant that the administration was in the hands of the many and not the few with equal justice given to all. Each year, 500 names were drawn from all the citizens of Athens. Those 500 citizens had to serve for one year as the law makers of ancient Athens.

All the citizens of Athens were required to vote on any new law that this body of 500 citizens created. Each man had one vote, and the majority ruled. Women, children, and slaves were not citizens, and thus, could not vote.