Category Geography

Why do some rich countries have no skyscrapers (like Sweden)?

Skyscrapers are first and foremost a space saving measure in places where you have to cram plenty of office space into a downtown location in order to accommodate all the people who are going to work there.

The notion that a skyscraper is a sign of development and affluence comes from places that have no space.

Sweden doesn’t need skyscrapers for two reasons:

  • we actually have space in our cities.
  • many operations are shifted to small towns because in this day and age, there is no need to confine everyone physically to a big city location, and then pay crazy rents.

When you live in Sweden, you notice that all your bills come from obscure little towns, not from Stockholm.

Why put a skyscraper in there?

There are some high buildings here, but if you’ve been to Shanghai or Hong Kong, they look pretty quaint. 

 

Credit : Quora

Picture Credit : Google

Why is gold expensive? Why can’t we consider gold as other metals like iron, aluminum, and silver?

Iron mining in Western Australia produced 826 million tons of iron ore in 2018, which will convert to roughly several hundred million tons of iron metal. (Note that ratio of ore to metal.) The scale of Australian extraction of iron ore is quite impressive. Those piles in the first picture? That’s iron ore, a mountain of it.

Iron ores are easily accessible, easily converted to iron metal, and can be found in vast quantities. Iron ore is so plentiful that Australia makes a profit selling the ore at $100 to $170 (Australian dollars) per ton. That’s pennies per pound of iron ore, never mind the cost per troy ounce.

Aluminum is also produced in huge quantities, with tens of millions of tons of metal made per year. Aluminum is found in a number of rich deposits of bauxite (available by the tens of billions of tons around the world) that converts from 2 tons of bauxite to 1 ton of aluminum metal.

But gold?

Gold’s yield from rock is measured in ounces per ton of ore. Gold mines may have to extract up to 100 tons of rock to get an ounce of gold.

If those 826 million tons of Australian iron ore were gold-bearing rock instead then you might get as little as 230 tons of gold from them. (Current global gold production is about 3,100 tons per year.)

Further, gold deposits are not as common as iron ores or aluminum ores.

That’s why gold isn’t going to be treated as an inexpensive metal like iron or aluminum. It just isn’t as common or easily found. Iron and aluminum actually make up a significant percentage of Earth’s mass; gold does not.

Gold is subject to some odd consumer demand that drives up its price unnecessarily at times, but one reason for its high cost is that it’s hard to extract and isn’t nearly as common as iron or aluminum.

 

Credit : Quora

Picture Credit : Google

How much freshwater do we have?

There’s a good reason our planet is called “the water planet- nearly two-thirds of it is covered in water. To quantify it further, that’s more than 300 million cubic miles of water. That’s quite adequate for humans, isn’t it? Well, not really. Because, 97% of it is in the oceans – salty, undrinkable and not usable for cooking or raising crops. Oh, so we have just 3%? Well, not even that much. Because about 2.5% of that is trapped in glaciers, ice caps, the atmosphere, and soil or is inaccessible because it lies very deep under the Earth’s surface. So that leaves us – over seven billion humans (and wildlife!) – with less than 0.5%. Do you know how little that is? A report says that if all the water in the world can be equated to 100 litres, then all the freshwater we have access to is about half-a-teaspoon! Our drinking and cooking water sources are groundwater, freshwater lakes, rivers, etc Though water can be seen as a renewable resource, the demand for freshwater has been slowly outdoing how much is replenished naturally, especially through the likes of rain. This is indicative not just of imbalance and a changing planet but also of potential global health and political crisis. That wars could be fought over water may not be a problem of a distant future. Which is why there has been consistent and loud calls for water conservation and recycling universally. The impact of water shortage has been showing, and when the problem becomes even more acute it will affect not just humans but also the plants and animals in it and most importantly, our planet itself as a whole.

 

Picture Credit : Google

Why is Bengali not in the list of classical languages of India?

At present there are 6 languages which are marked as classical language in India.

  • Tamil (declared in 2004)
  • Sanskrit (2005)
  • Kannada (2008)
  • Telugu (2008)
  • Malayalam (2013)
  • Oriya (or Odia) (2014)

The reason why Bengali is not in this list is – Bengali has been derived from Magadhi-Apabhransha which is again derived from Sansrit-Prakrit. Unlike the classic languages which predates bengali and are more of a direct language.

According to information provided by the Ministry of Culture in the Rajya Sabha in February 2014, the guidelines for declaring a language as ‘Classical’ are:

“(i) High antiquity of its early texts/recorded history over a period of 1500-2000 years;

(ii) A body of ancient literature/texts, which is considered a valuable heritage by generations of speakers;

(iii) The literary tradition be original and not borrowed from another speech community;

(iv) The classical language and literature being distinct from modern, there may also be a discontinuity between the classical language and its later forms or its offshoots.”

Bengali does not satisfy all the criteria mentioned above.

 

Credit : Quora

Picture Credit : Google

Do airliners fly over the Himalayas?

Not only the Himalayas but planes don’t fly directly over the Pacific ocean too. They instead choose alternative paths for flying even if they have to cover a longer distance.(ie. flight paths are curved towards the pole instead of a straight line across the Pacific).

So first and the foremost reason is the height of Himalayas.

If we talk about the Himalayas, all the peaks of Himalayas is more than 20,000 feet high which are not suitable for the commercial airplanes to fly as they fly over 30,000 feet to avoid all weather related disturbances whose centre is stratosphere. In stratosphere no weather related disturbances occur and it’s the most suitable for the airplanes to fly.

There are also other important reasons :-

No scope for emergency landing.

They avoid flying over the Pacific Ocean and opt for curved routes because the curved routes are safer as airlines then fly over the land than the ocean. Therefore they spend less time over the ocean, allowing for emergency landings. Emergency landing is done on a flat land. Moreover the Himalayan regions are also not safe for emergency landings as the region has no flat surfaces. Additionally the risk factor also increases as there are mountains everywhere.

2. All weather related events occur in troposphere and the height of troposphere ranges upto 20 km from lithosphere. In troposphere the weather is not suitable for the airplanes to fly because changing weather patterns have a negative impact on the flight of airplanes and there are chances of occurrence of unfortunate events.

3.Another important reason why commercial airplanes don’t fly over the Himalayas is that the Indian Air Force and the People’s Liberation Army Air Force conduct training sessions in the region. They restrict commercial airlines from flying above them.

4. There is also a risk of oxygen running out in these areas as airlines usually have only 20 min of emergency oxygen. So in a situation where the supply runs out, the flight must descend to at least 10,000 feet to replenish oxygen, which is known as Drift Down Procedure. But in Himalayas, descending to 10,000 feet is suicide.

5. They have to overcome the weather related disturbances and there is also scarcity of oxygen. Additionally on the peaks of the Himalayas, air turbulence is also abnormal which affects the speed of airplanes and even the passengers may face discomfort due to the scarcity of oxygen.

6. The Himalayan region is scarcely populated due to which Navigation Radar Service can be barely found and the pilots face difficulties in establishing a connection with the ground and in case of any emergency the pilot will not be able to seek any help due to poor Navigation Radar Service. So the pilots find it better to opt for alternative instead of flying over the Himalayas and the Pacific Ocean.

7. And this one is interesting :(Flat maps)

The main reason flight don’t go over the Pacific Ocean is because curved routes are shorter than straight routes.

Flat maps are confusing as the earth itself isn’t flat.

As a result the straight routes don’t offer the shortest distance. You can verify this by conducting a small experiment using a globe. Identify two locations such as the US and the Middle Asia, and then connect a piece of string directly between these two areas to mimic a straight route. Use a marker to highlight the distance . Then similarly measure a curved path. Assuming that you followed the above mentioned steps correctly, you will discover that the curved route is physically shorter than the straight route.

If you are still not convinced here is another logical reason :

Airplanes follow a geodesic curve while flying. Geodesic means the shortest distance between the points in terms of constant velocity. If there is an airport where you have to reach and the airplane hops at one airport on the way, then there is also an airport nearby with the same distance from your destination. All airplane routes are planned based on this geodesic curve but the Himalayan region and the Pacific Ocean region lacks airports.

So now you must be having a clear idea that it is not a mystery that airplanes do not fly over the Himalayas and the Pacific Ocean but it is the scientific reasons which make it impossible and doesn’t allow airplanes to fly over the Himalayan and the Pacific region.

 

Credit : Quora

Picture Credit : Google

What is the oldest undisturbed, untouched forest in the world?

Mount Lico, a mountain in Northern Mozambique, Africa, stands at approximately 1,100 meters with up to 700 meters of sheer rock walls, making it difficult for humans to climb; who aspires to climb a 1,100 meter mountain anyway, when you can climb higher mountains at more relative ease?

Mount Lico supports an old-growth rainforest atop its peak:

It’s not exactly untouched: in 2018 a team of researchers and expert mountaineers visited the forest (detected for scientific reasons by Google Earth) for exploration*. They encountered small animals that may or not be known to science thus far (including a new species of butterfly). Curiously, they also noticed mysterious clay pots placed near a mountaintop stream that they assume were left there for ceremonial reasons. The most conclusive perception of the forest, given all news reports, is that the forest has been largely untouched, un-accessed and thankfully undisturbed for a very long time.

 

Credit : Quora

Picture Credit : Google